ISP Setup

Support forum for routers of all shapes and sizes. As long as it's router based and doesn't fall into the other categories, this is the place to ask your questions.
Post Reply
User avatar
the_flames
Regular
Regular
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 10:25 pm
Location: UK

ISP Setup

Post by the_flames » Sat Jun 07, 2008 6:47 pm

I wonder is my Safecom SWAMR-54108 running the RouterTech_3.6.0D_20070227_2.20 firmware can connect to my new ISP (BE unlimited)

the connection setup it uses is as follows

****
VCI= 101
VPI= 0
DSL Connectivity Mode: RFC 1483 bridged
Protocol: IPoATM
Encapsulation: LLC -based
Modulation: G.dmt 992.5 Annex A (Annex M for Be Pro members)

No username and password are required to use Be*'s service.
***

Ive tried to setup the connection, screenshot attached but I'm unable to connect.

is it possible to use my router, if so how :D
Attachments
settings.jpg
(105.17 KiB) Downloaded 33 times
rhole
Novice
Novice
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 3:10 am

Post by rhole » Sat Jun 07, 2008 7:52 pm

You are using the wrong connection type.

From the Connection Type drop-down box, choose either Static or DHCP. Then set the "Encapsulation" to LLC and the "Mode" at the bottom to Bridge and not Routed. :D


I am on Be* Pro, with my RT router, I get a much higher Upload Sync @2.7Mbit (2.3 on the speedtouch), with a little lower Download sync (when compared to the speedtouch). I bridge my RT router to my Speedtouch. So I can use the RT capabilities.
mstombs
RouterTech Team
RouterTech Team
Posts: 3753
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:54 pm

Post by mstombs » Sat Jun 07, 2008 8:16 pm

There has been some discussion before that Be is MAC locked, is it no longer needed to change the DSL MAC address?
User avatar
the_flames
Regular
Regular
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 10:25 pm
Location: UK

Post by the_flames » Sat Jun 07, 2008 8:18 pm

thanks for that, unfortunately with my Safecom router it runs slower, it only connects at 8bm, while the bebox connects at 11, must be the hardware in the router :|
rhole
Novice
Novice
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 3:10 am

Post by rhole » Sat Jun 07, 2008 8:18 pm

Definitely not MAC locked, just wrong connection type.
User avatar
the_flames
Regular
Regular
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 10:25 pm
Location: UK

Post by the_flames » Sat Jun 07, 2008 8:19 pm

mstombs wrote:There has been some discussion before that Be is MAC locked, is it no longer needed to change the DSL MAC address?
It doesn't seem to be MAC locked, but I may be wrong ;)
Post Reply