RouterTech Firmware 2.92 Discussion
Re: RouterTech Firmware 2.92 Discussion
Hi everybody,
I have D-Link DSL-G684T (Annex B). Tried to upgrade 2.9 --> 2.92 via web interface (single image). Run RUC, login in web browser, clicked "Update Gateway". Everything went without problems: "thermometer" reached 100%, web browser reloaded login page... and showed old 2.9 version.
I made 7 attempts varying: IE8/FF/Chrome, WinXP/Win7, resetting to defaults, waiting extra 10 minutes... but no luck. Can anyone comment this?
Thanks.
I have D-Link DSL-G684T (Annex B). Tried to upgrade 2.9 --> 2.92 via web interface (single image). Run RUC, login in web browser, clicked "Update Gateway". Everything went without problems: "thermometer" reached 100%, web browser reloaded login page... and showed old 2.9 version.
I made 7 attempts varying: IE8/FF/Chrome, WinXP/Win7, resetting to defaults, waiting extra 10 minutes... but no luck. Can anyone comment this?
Thanks.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 4:12 pm
- Location: Madriz
Re: RouterTech Firmware 2.92 Discussion
¿fragmented flash memory?ilog wrote:Hi everybody,
I have D-Link DSL-G684T (Annex B). Tried to upgrade 2.9 --> 2.92 via web interface (single image). Run RUC, login in web browser, clicked "Update Gateway". Everything went without problems: "thermometer" reached 100%, web browser reloaded login page... and showed old 2.9 version.
I made 7 attempts varying: IE8/FF/Chrome, WinXP/Win7, resetting to defaults, waiting extra 10 minutes... but no luck. Can anyone comment this?
Thanks.
Re: RouterTech Firmware 2.92 Discussion
So, adam2_defragenv.sh from ssh ? Or something else?
Update: I don't have check_env or defrag script in /usr/local/bin/ - can you give me a clue how to defragment? Can it be done with memopt?
Update: I don't have check_env or defrag script in /usr/local/bin/ - can you give me a clue how to defragment? Can it be done with memopt?
- thechief
- RouterTech Team
- Posts: 12067
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 10:22 pm
- Location: England, the Centre of Africa
- Contact:
Re: RouterTech Firmware 2.92 Discussion
The Chief: Be sure to read the Firmware FAQ and do a Forum Search before posting!
No support via PM. Ask all questions on the open forum.
No support via PM. Ask all questions on the open forum.
Re: RouterTech Firmware 2.92 Discussion
Thanks a million, thechief ! It helped. Moreover, visually, web UI works faster now. It's so good, that I joined the great RouterTech tribe. It owns the magicthechief wrote:viewtopic.php?f=19&t=2984
Re: RouterTech Firmware 2.92 Discussion
Excuse me if this is in some obvious place, but I did look and just haven't found it.
Given that RT is already on a given router, is there ever an instance where you can't upgrade via the UI?
I've upgraded several Aztech DSL 600EU's from factory firmware, so I'm accustomed to going through the PCTool rigmarole. However, I'd never updated RT to RT before. Just now, I tried upgrading 2.90A to 2.92 via the UI, being sure to follow the instructions about being set to factory defaults, etc., and this may sound mad, but it goes through the 0 to 100% phase perfectly authentically in a couple minutes, and then goes to the login screen. I sit there patiently for another 5-7 minutes, and then login: to 2.90A.
It's a successful firmware upgrade that doesn't upgrade. I tried it twice with the same result. I'm using the one RUC mentioned:
RouterTech_3.6.0D_20100105_2.92_AR7RD-1Port_Adam2_firmware.upgrade.img
At first, I thought it was browser cache, but it wasn't. Even logging into it via Telnet showed the old version. It was definitely still there. Power cycling didn't help, either.
Does this model maybe always require PCTool? What about the DSL605EU?
Given that RT is already on a given router, is there ever an instance where you can't upgrade via the UI?
I've upgraded several Aztech DSL 600EU's from factory firmware, so I'm accustomed to going through the PCTool rigmarole. However, I'd never updated RT to RT before. Just now, I tried upgrading 2.90A to 2.92 via the UI, being sure to follow the instructions about being set to factory defaults, etc., and this may sound mad, but it goes through the 0 to 100% phase perfectly authentically in a couple minutes, and then goes to the login screen. I sit there patiently for another 5-7 minutes, and then login: to 2.90A.
It's a successful firmware upgrade that doesn't upgrade. I tried it twice with the same result. I'm using the one RUC mentioned:
RouterTech_3.6.0D_20100105_2.92_AR7RD-1Port_Adam2_firmware.upgrade.img
At first, I thought it was browser cache, but it wasn't. Even logging into it via Telnet showed the old version. It was definitely still there. Power cycling didn't help, either.
Does this model maybe always require PCTool? What about the DSL605EU?
-
- Novice
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 4:12 pm
- Location: Madriz
Re: RouterTech Firmware 2.92 Discussion
quite easy. hmm ???ilog wrote:Thanks a million, thechief ! It helped. Moreover, visually, web UI works faster now. It's so good, that I joined the great RouterTech tribe. It owns the magicthechief wrote:viewtopic.php?f=19&t=2984
Re: RouterTech Firmware 2.92 Discussion
I guess you're referring to me. I missed that part of the conversation above. So, it looks like it would be the answer, but is it the best answer? It uses the phrases "act of desperation" and "last resort." That, to me, makes it sound like PCTool is the better option one last time. I wonder.
BTW, is there a way to check your fragmentation level in 2.90A? check_env doesn't seem to exist yet in this version.
How frequently is defrag necessary in general? This is only the second build I've tried.
BTW, is there a way to check your fragmentation level in 2.90A? check_env doesn't seem to exist yet in this version.
How frequently is defrag necessary in general? This is only the second build I've tried.
- thechief
- RouterTech Team
- Posts: 12067
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 10:22 pm
- Location: England, the Centre of Africa
- Contact:
Re: RouterTech Firmware 2.92 Discussion
Yes.rseiler wrote:That, to me, makes it sound like PCTool is the better option one last time. I wonder.
No. This is a new feature.rseiler wrote:BTW, is there a way to check your fragmentation level in 2.90A?
The first time you do it, it would be a historic defrag (i.e., years of fragmentation removed). After that, about once every couple of months should be fine. Better still, run auto_defragenv.sh.rseiler wrote:How frequently is defrag necessary in general?
The Chief: Be sure to read the Firmware FAQ and do a Forum Search before posting!
No support via PM. Ask all questions on the open forum.
No support via PM. Ask all questions on the open forum.
Re: RouterTech Firmware 2.92 Discussion
Understood, and thanks. I'll use the tool and then rely on auto_defragenv.sh after that.
I'm curious though, is the method that auto_defragenv.sh uses somehow less risky than the other earlier, manual methods? Defrag seems to have gone from something you only do as a last resort, to something done on a regularly basis automatically, albeit not by default. I haven't seen any recommendations against setting auto_defragenv.sh, so it sounds like something has fundamentally improved.
I'm curious though, is the method that auto_defragenv.sh uses somehow less risky than the other earlier, manual methods? Defrag seems to have gone from something you only do as a last resort, to something done on a regularly basis automatically, albeit not by default. I haven't seen any recommendations against setting auto_defragenv.sh, so it sounds like something has fundamentally improved.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 9:15 pm
Re: RouterTech Firmware 2.92 Discussion
i've dlink 524t router with installed 2.91 firmware here details
Firmware version information
BUILD=RouterTech_3.6.0D_20090922_2.91.1
VERSION=3.6.0D-RouterTech-4P-Adam2
BOARD=AR7RD
TARGET=Adam2-4mb-flash
FSSTAMP=20090922151907
i try to install RouterTech_3.6.0D_20100105_2.92_AR7RD-4Ports_Adam2-4mb-flash_firmware.upgrade.img downloaded here, but nothing
under ie8 process is ok but version remain 2.91.1
under chrome status return me checksum error and nothing
help me please
thanks
Firmware version information
BUILD=RouterTech_3.6.0D_20090922_2.91.1
VERSION=3.6.0D-RouterTech-4P-Adam2
BOARD=AR7RD
TARGET=Adam2-4mb-flash
FSSTAMP=20090922151907
i try to install RouterTech_3.6.0D_20100105_2.92_AR7RD-4Ports_Adam2-4mb-flash_firmware.upgrade.img downloaded here, but nothing
under ie8 process is ok but version remain 2.91.1
under chrome status return me checksum error and nothing
help me please
thanks
-
- Novice
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 4:12 pm
- Location: Madriz
Re: RouterTech Firmware 2.92 Discussion
OMG , mate ... same problem again????ilog wrote:Thanks a million, thechief ! It helped. Moreover, visually, web UI works faster now. It's so good, that I joined the great RouterTech tribe. It owns the magicthechief wrote:viewtopic.php?f=19&t=2984
- thechief
- RouterTech Team
- Posts: 12067
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 10:22 pm
- Location: England, the Centre of Africa
- Contact:
Re: RouterTech Firmware 2.92 Discussion
You take a risk anytime you write to the flash chip. However, the risk is less when it is done from within the firmware in a manner that is supported and documented.rseiler wrote:I'm curious though, is the method that auto_defragenv.sh uses somehow less risky than the other earlier, manual methods? Defrag seems to have gone from something you only do as a last resort, to something done on a regularly basis automatically, albeit not by default. I haven't seen any recommendations against setting auto_defragenv.sh, so it sounds like something has fundamentally improved.
The Chief: Be sure to read the Firmware FAQ and do a Forum Search before posting!
No support via PM. Ask all questions on the open forum.
No support via PM. Ask all questions on the open forum.
- thechief
- RouterTech Team
- Posts: 12067
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 10:22 pm
- Location: England, the Centre of Africa
- Contact:
Re: RouterTech Firmware 2.92 Discussion
The problem is fragmentation: firmware-faq/#fragmentationMastericarus333 wrote:i've dlink 524t router with installed 2.91 firmware here details
Firmware version information
BUILD=RouterTech_3.6.0D_20090922_2.91.1
VERSION=3.6.0D-RouterTech-4P-Adam2
BOARD=AR7RD
TARGET=Adam2-4mb-flash
FSSTAMP=20090922151907
i try to install RouterTech_3.6.0D_20100105_2.92_AR7RD-4Ports_Adam2-4mb-flash_firmware.upgrade.img downloaded here, but nothing
under ie8 process is ok but version remain 2.91.1
under chrome status return me checksum error and nothing
help me please
thanks
(assuming you don't have a minix partition, etc., that you didn't first unmount).
The Chief: Be sure to read the Firmware FAQ and do a Forum Search before posting!
No support via PM. Ask all questions on the open forum.
No support via PM. Ask all questions on the open forum.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 9:15 pm
Re: RouterTech Firmware 2.92 Discussion
yes i made it but nothingthechief wrote:The problem is fragmentation: firmware-faq/#fragmentation
minix partition? i've updated only from original dlink firmware to routrertech 2.91.1 and all ok, now no update allowed.(assuming you don't have a minix partition, etc., that you didn't first unmount).